March 22, 2014
12:59 p.m.
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Nathaniel Smith <njs@pobox.com> wrote:
Hi all,
After 88 emails we don't have a conclusion in the other thread (see [1] for background). But we have to come to some conclusion or another if we want @ to exist :-). So I'll summarize where the discussion stands and let's see if we can find some way to resolve this.
"The numpy community has no consensus strongly preferring one option over another" is a perfectly fine conclusion to this thread on numpy-discussion, IMO. Actually deciding what goes into the PEP given that input and merged with other concerns should probably happen on python-ideas. -- Robert Kern