On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Pauli Virtanen <pav@iki.fi> wrote:

Wed, 28 Apr 2010 14:12:07 -0400, Alan G Isaac wrote: [clip]

Here is a related ticket that proposes a more explicit alternative: adding a ``dot`` method to ndarray. http://projects.scipy.org/numpy/ticket/1456

I kind of like this idea. Simple, obvious, and leads to clear code:

a.dot(b).dot(c)

or in another multiplication order,

a.dot(b.dot(c))

And here's an implementation:

http://github.com/pv/numpy-work/commit/414429ce0bb0c4b7e780c4078c5ff71c11305...

I think I'm going to apply this, unless someone complains,

I have a big one: NO DOCSTRING!!! We're just perpetuating the errors of the past people! Very discouraging! DG

as I don't see any downsides (except maybe adding one more to the huge list of methods ndarray already has).

Cheers, Pauli

_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion

-- Mathematician: noun, someone who disavows certainty when their uncertainty set is non-empty, even if that set has measure zero.