On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Ralf Gommers
<
ralf.gommers@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 3:02 PM, David Cournapeau <
cournape@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was wondering if we could finally move to a more recent version of
>> compilers for official win32 installers. This would of course concern
>> the next release cycle, not the ones where beta/rc are already in
>> progress.
>>
>> Basically, the pros:
>> - we will have to move at some point
>> - gcc 4.* seem less buggy, especially C++ and fortran.
>> - no need to maintain msvcr90 vodoo
>> The cons:
>> - it will most likely break the ABI
>> - we need to recompile atlas (but I can take care of it)
>> - the biggest: it is difficult to combine gfortran with visual
>> studio (more exactly you cannot link gfortran runtime to a visual
>> studio executable). The only solution I could think of would be to
>> recompile the gfortran runtime with Visual Studio, which for some
>> reason does not sound very appealing :)
>
> To get the datetime changes to work with MinGW, we already concluded that
> building with 4.x is more or less required (without recognizing some of the
> points you list above). Changes to mingw32ccompiler to fix compilation with
> 4.x went in in
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/156. It would be good if
> you could check those.