![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/bf402f309d40d607a369395e32a984fc.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 16:21 +0100, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 10:53 -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
I've been bitten several times by this.
logical_or (a, b, c)
is silently accepted when I really meant
logical_or (logical_or (a, b), c)
because the logic functions are binary, where I expected them to be m-ary.
I don't think you mean m-ary. It's just a simple binary OR of more
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Henry Gomersall <heng@cantab.net> wrote: than
one variable. I don't even know what a m-ary OR would mean (a bit-wise OR of the binary representation?)
It's already a bit-wise OR of an array, that's the whole point (otherwise you could just use `or'!)
Different "ary": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arity
haha! Apologies, my bad. Though talking about m-ary in a context like this is just damned confusing. Henry