data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d421f/d421f94409c9c58530c3b155d2e2e0b410cb1ca7" alt=""
Travis Oliphant <oliphant@ee.byu.edu> writes:
If we just implemented Python scalars for the other precisions then much of this rank 0 array business would be solved as we could always return the Python scalar rather than an array for rank 0 arrays.
I believe Konrad made this suggestion many moons ago and I would agree
Right. I still think this is the best solution in that it is the least confusing. If I remember correctly, the main objection was that implementing all those types was not as trivial as hoped, but I forgot the details (and it wasn't me who tried). Konrad. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Konrad Hinsen | E-Mail: hinsen@cnrs-orleans.fr Centre de Biophysique Moleculaire (CNRS) | Tel.: +33-2.38.25.56.24 Rue Charles Sadron | Fax: +33-2.38.63.15.17 45071 Orleans Cedex 2 | Deutsch/Esperanto/English/ France | Nederlands/Francais -------------------------------------------------------------------------------