Feb. 16, 2013
6:52 p.m.
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Bradley M. Froehle <brad.froehle@gmail.com
wrote:
Have you considered using .transpose(...) instead?
My apologies... I didn't read enough of the thread to see what the issue was about. I personally think rollaxis(...) is quite confusing and instead choose to use .transpose(...) for clarity. You can interpret my suggestion as a means of implementing moveaxis w/o calling rollaxis. In fact rollaxis is built out of the .transpose(...) primitive anyway. Cheers, Brad