On 22 Oct 2014 14:57, "Daπid" <davidmenhur@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 22 October 2014 15:43, Nathaniel Smith <njs@pobox.com> wrote:
>>
>> I guess we could make this more consistent by hand if we wanted - isnan is pretty cheap?
>
>
>
> Can it be made avoiding storing the full bool array? The 1/8 memory overhead can be problematic for large arrays.

Yeah,  we could push the check into the inner loop so the memory overhead would be, like, 1 byte.