On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 7:59 PM, Robert Kern <robert.kern@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Nathaniel Smith <njs@pobox.com> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> After 88 emails we don't have a conclusion in the other thread (see
>> [1] for background). But we have to come to some conclusion or another
>> if we want @ to exist :-). So I'll summarize where the discussion
>> stands and let's see if we can find some way to resolve this.
>
> "The numpy community has no consensus strongly preferring one option
> over another" is a perfectly fine conclusion to this thread on
> numpy-discussion, IMO. Actually deciding what goes into the PEP given
> that input and merged with other concerns should probably happen on
> python-ideas.

Yep, if we converge on deadlock then that's what we'll do, but I'm not
yet convinced that we've converged at all. In the last few hours the
"vote" deltas are right -1, left +3...