Right, that makes sense. Thanks. On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Frédéric Bastien <nouiz@nouiz.org> wrote:
Hi,
I think he was referring that making NUMPY_ARRAY_OBJECT[...] syntax support the operation that you said is hard. But having a separate function do it is less complicated as you said.
Fred
Can you clarify why it would be super hard? I just reused the code for advanced indexing (a modification of PyArray_SetMap). Am I missing something crucial?
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Travis Oliphant <travis@continuum.io> wrote:
On Jun 26, 2012, at 11:46 AM, John Salvatier wrote:
Hello,
If you increment an array using advanced indexing and have repeated indexes, the array doesn't get repeatedly incremented,
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.numeric.general/50291.
I wrote a C function that does incrementing with repeated indexes correctly. The branch is here (https://github.com/jsalvatier/numpy see the last two commits). Would a patch with a cleaned up version of a function like
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 1:27 PM, John Salvatier <jsalvati@u.washington.edu> wrote: this be
accepted into numpy? I'm not experienced writing numpy C code so I'm sure it still needs improvement.
This is great. It is an often-requested feature. It's *very difficult* to do without changing fundamentally what NumPy is. But, yes this would be a great pull request.
Thanks,
-Travis
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion