![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/a5c6e0b8f64a8a1940f5b2d367c1db6e.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Nov. 24, 2020
7:50 p.m.
On 11/24/2020 2:06 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
There are still ozone holes over the Antarctic, last time I looked they were explained as due to an influx of cold air.
I believe industrial CFC usage, which has fallen since the Montreal Protocol, is still considered the primary culprit in ozone layer thinning. Is there a particular model you have in mind? (Ideally one with publicly available source code and some data.) On 11/24/2020 2:06 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
If you want to deal with GHG, push nuclear power.
Yes. However, solar is becoming competitive is some regions for cost per watt, and avoids the worst waste disposal issues. fwiw, Alan Isaac