Hi Matthew, On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 5:48 PM, Matthew Brett <matthew.brett@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Ondrej,
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Ondřej Čertík <ondrej.certik@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal <chris.barker@noaa.gov> wrote:
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Matthew Brett <matthew.brett@gmail.com> wrote:
a) If we cannot build Scipy now, it may or may not be acceptable to release numpy now. I think it is, you (Ralf) think it isn't, we haven't discussed that. It may not come up.
Is anyone suggesting we hold the whole release for this? I fnot, then
Just to make it clear, I do not plan to hold the whole release because of this. Previous releases also didn't have this official 64bit Windows binary, so there is no regression.
Once we figure out how to create 64bit binaries, then we'll start uploading them.
Did you make any progress with this? Worth making some notes? Anything we can do to help?
Unfortunately I've been too busy the last month to push this through, so right now I am just concentrating on getting 1.7.1 out of the door, as that is higher priority. I am starting a new job on Monday, so once things settle down, I should be able to get back to this. I will post notes once I get to this again. Ondrej