On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 10:30 PM, Ralf Gommers <ralf.gommers@gmail.com> wrote:


On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 1:02 PM, Charles R Harris <charlesr.harris@gmail.com> wrote:


On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 1:45 PM, Peter Creasey <p.e.creasey.00@googlemail.com> wrote:
+1 for keeping the same CoC as Scipy, making a new thing just seems a
bigger surface area to maintain. Personally I already assumed Scipy's
"honour[ing] diversity in..." did not imply any protection of
behaviours that violate the CoC *itself*, but if you wanted to be
really explicit you could add "to the extent that these do not
conflict with this code of conduct." to that line.

I prefer that to the proposed modification, short and sweet.

This edit to the SciPy CoC has now been merged.

It looks to me like we're good to go here and take over the SciPy CoC.


+1

ChuckÂ