[Numpy-discussion] Re: A better syntax for using ufunc.at?

This is interesting, thank you for pointing it out! Good to know this is not a Numpy-only problem, I guess lol. Though the proposed syntax looks similar to my idea, I believe they are talking about a different problem there relating to translating python code to an accelerated language. I simply want a `ndarray.at` to be a syntax sugar for accessing `ufunc.at` in a more readable way. But if that proposal goes through `at` probably won't be a good name anymore, haha.