On Feb 5, 2016 8:28 AM, "Chris Barker - NOAA Federal" <chris.barker@noaa.gov> wrote:
>
> > An extra ~2 hours of tests / 6-way parallelism is not that big a deal
> > in the grand scheme of things (and I guess it's probably less than
> > that if we can take advantage of existing binary builds)
>
> If we set up a numpy-testing conda channel, it could be used to cache
> binary builds for all he versions of everything we want to test
> against.
>
> Conda-build-all could make it manageable to maintain that channel.

What would be the advantage of maintaining that channel ourselves instead of using someone else's binary builds that already exist (e.g. Anaconda's, or official project wheels)?

-n