![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/ad13088a623822caf74e635a68a55eae.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 1:47 PM, René Dudfield <renesd@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Ravi <lists_ravi@lavabit.com> wrote:
On Wednesday 30 December 2009 06:15:45 René Dudfield wrote:
I agree with many things in that post. Except your conclusion on multiple versions of packages in isolation. Package isolation is like processes, and package sharing is like threads - and threads are evil!
You have stated this several times, but is there any evidence that this is the desire of the majority of users? In the scientific community, interactive experimentation is critical and users are typically not seasoned systems administrators. For such users, almost all packages installed after installing python itself are packages they use. In particular, all I want to do is to use apt/yum to get the packages (or ask my sysadmin, who rightfully has no interest in learning the intricacies of python package installation, to do so) and continue with my work. "Packages-in-isolation" is for people whose job is to run server farms, not interactive experimenters.
500+ packages on pypi. Provide a counter point, otherwise the evidence is against your position - overwhelmingly.
packages on pypi has no implication whether I have only one version of it or several in different isolated environment. Actually, I have only 1 version for almost all packages that I use, and those are on the python path, (and many of them are easy_installed from pypi, or exe installed). The only ones I have in several versions are the ones I work on myself, or where I track a repository. Josef
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion