On Nov 7, 2007 6:46 PM, Timothy Hochberg <tim.hochberg@ieee.org> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On Nov 7, 2007 10:35 AM, Sebastian Haase < haase@msg.ucsf.edu> wrote:
> >
> > On Nov 7, 2007 5:23 PM, Matthieu Brucher <matthieu.brucher@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I don't understand.  I'm thinking of most math functions in the
> > > > C-library. In C a boolean is just an integer of 0 or 1 (quasi, by
> > > > definition).
> > > >
> > > > Could you explain what you mean ?
> > > >
> > >
> > > In C++, bool is a new type that has two values, true and false. If you
> add
> > > true and true, it is still true, and not 2. In C, everything that is not
> 0
> > > is true, not in C++.
> >
> > Yes, I know this. But my situation is "the other way around". Lets say
> > I want to count "foreground pixels" in an image: I would want to "sum"
> > all the true values, i.e. a true *is* a 1 and a false *is* a 0.
> >
> > In other words, I'm really thinking of (older kind of) C, where there
> > *was* no bool.
> > I assume this thinking still applies to the internal arithmetic of CPUs
> today.
> > Also the "bit-values" of a boolean array (in memory) are set this way
> > already anyway !
> >
> > How can I simply call my functions looking at these bit values ?
> > (essentially interpreting a boolean true as 1 and false as 0)
>
> I'm not sure how well this would work, but could you change the dtype before
> passing the array to your function? If you wanted a copy, you could just to
> the equivalent of a.astype(unit8). However, if you didn't want a copy, you
> could set the dtype to unit8, operate on the array and then reset it to
> bool:
> >>> a = np.array([True, True, False, True])
> >>> a
> array([ True,  True, False,  True], dtype=bool)
> >>> a.dtype = np.uint8
> >>> a
> array([1, 1, 0, 1], dtype=uint8)
> >>> # do something with 'a' here
> >>> a.dtype = bool
> >>> a
> array([ True,  True, False,  True], dtype=bool)
> This assumes everything is single threaded. If you have multiple threads
> accessing 'a', this could be a problem... And, you probably want to do this
> in C, so translate as appropriate.
>
> -tim
>

Thanks Tim, this sound like a good idea.  How about creating an
a = a.view()
before changing dtype.

This should make the proposed solution thread safe again.
How "expensive" is the creation of a view (performance wise, e.g.
compared to calling a trivial C-function) ?