On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 8:31 AM, Lluís <xscript@gmx.net> wrote:

Hi there,

I haven't been able to find an answer after a quick search, but are there any
plans regarding the (re)inclusion of missing data support into some future
version of numpy?

Not at the moment, but it sits in the back of my mind. Mark's dynd work will include missing values at some point and I think we should see what that looks like. We also need to agree on how they should be interpreted.

They won't be in 1.8, too little time for that.

Chuck