On 15. Feb 2024, at 22:13, Marten van Kerkwijk <mhvk@astro.utoronto.ca> wrote:
What were your conclusions after experimenting with chained ufuncs?If the speed is comparable to numexpr, wouldn’t it be `nicer` to havenon-string input format?It would feel a bit less like a black-box.
I haven't gotten further than it yet, it is just some toying around I've
been doing. But I'd indeed prefer not to go via strings -- possibly
numexpr could use a similar mechanism to what I did to construct the
function that is being evaluated.
Aside: your suggestion of the pipe led to some further discussion at
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/25826#issuecomment-1947342581
-- as a more general way of passing arrays to functions.
-- Marten
_______________________________________________
NumPy-Discussion mailing list -- numpy-discussion@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to numpy-discussion-leave@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/numpy-discussion.python.org/
Member address: michael.siebert2k@gmail.com