Message: 3
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 17:58:57 -0600
From: Charles R Harris <charlesr.harris@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Numpy-discussion] Resolving the associativity/precedence
	debate for @
To: Discussion of Numerical Python <numpy-discussion@scipy.org>
Message-ID:
	<CAB6mnxLyjNA5BHgOHO+U8+p3UmvXdjGg+ZUqfwi+vjFHfosxxQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 5:56 PM, Nathaniel Smith <njs@pobox.com> wrote:

> On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Nathaniel Smith <njs@pobox.com> wrote:

> > After 88 emails we don't have a conclusion in the other thread (see
> > [1] for background). But we have to come to some conclusion or another
> > if we want @ to exist :-). So I'll summarize where the discussion
> > stands and let's see if we can find some way to resolve this.

>
> Response in this thread so far seems (AFAICT) to have pretty much
> converged on same-left.
>
> If you think that this would be terrible and there is some compelling
> argument against it, then please speak up! Otherwise, if no-one
> objects, then I'll go ahead in the next few days and put same-left
> into the PEP.
>

I think we should take a close look at broadcasting before deciding on the
precedence.

Chuck
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20140324/626e79be/attachment-0001.html 

------------------------------