Thanks Stefan.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2009/5/11 Stéfan van der Walt <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:stefan@sun.ac.za">stefan@sun.ac.za</a>&gt;</span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="im">2009/5/11 Chris Colbert &lt;<a href="mailto:sccolbert@gmail.com">sccolbert@gmail.com</a>&gt;:<br>
</div><div class="im">&gt; Does the scipy implementation do this differently? I thought that since FFTW<br>
&gt; support has been dropped, that scipy and numpy use the same routines...<br>
<br>
</div>Just to be clear, I was referring to scipy.signal.fftconvolve, not<br>
scipy&#39;s FFT (which is the same as NumPy&#39;s).<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
Regards<br>
Stéfan<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Numpy-discussion mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Numpy-discussion@scipy.org">Numpy-discussion@scipy.org</a><br>
<a href="http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion" target="_blank">http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>