Oct. 16, 2014
8:31 p.m.
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 2:23 AM, Benjamin Root <ben.root@ou.edu> wrote:
It isn't really a question of accuracy. It breaks unit tests and reproducibility elsewhere. My vote is to revert to the old behavior in 1.9.1.
Why would one want the 2nd order differences at all, if they're not more accurate? Should we just revert the patch entirely? I assumed the change had some benefit... -- Nathaniel J. Smith Postdoctoral researcher - Informatics - University of Edinburgh http://vorpus.org