This is a complicated issue to describe but i think the bottom line is that the test is just wonky here. the behaviour it's checking for is: wrong in old numpy, but we do it anyway (bug) wrong in current numpy without RELAXED_STRIDES, and we get it right (I.e. don't do it, fixed bug) correct in current numpy with RELAXED_STRIDES (and I think the test will pass if you build 1.8 this way?) (fixed bug again, since the definition of "correct" flipped) correct in future numpys (@seberg, does that look right?) I guess maybe we could go back and make sure it stays broken in 1.8, but it's probably not worth the trouble because this is such a corner case. Nothing real is going to break because of this AFAICT. -n On 2 Oct 2013 08:31, "Christoph Gohlke" <cgohlke@uci.edu> wrote:

On 9/30/2013 8:17 AM, Charles R Harris wrote:

Hi All,

NumPy 1.8.0rc1 is up now on sourceforge <http://sourceforge.net/**projects/numpy/files/NumPy/1.**8.0rc1/<http://sourceforge.net/projects/numpy/files/NumPy/1.8.0rc1/>> .The binary builds are included except for Python 3.3 on windows, which will arrive later. Many thanks to Ralf for the binaries, and to those who found and fixed the bugs in the last beta. Any remaining bugs are all my fault ;) I hope this will be the last release before final, so please test it thoroughly.

Chuck

One more: Cython-0.19.1 fails relaxed_strides.test_one_sized with "ValueError: ndarray is not C-contiguous". Tested on numpy-MKL-1.8.0rc1-win-amd64-**py2.7 and msvc9.

https://github.com/cython/**cython/blob/0.19.x/tests/** memoryview/relaxed_strides.**pyx#L29<https://github.com/cython/cython/blob/0.19.x/tests/memoryview/relaxed_strides.pyx#L29>

The relevant test output is attached.

Christoph

_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion