On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Thouis (Ray) Jones <thouis@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Thouis (Ray) Jones <thouis@gmail.com> wrote:
I started the import with the oldest 75 and newest 125 Trac issues, and will wait a few hours to do the rest to allow feedback, just in case something is broken that I haven't noticed.
I did make one change to better emulate Trac behavior. Some Trac usernames are also email addresses, which Trac anonymizes in its display. I decided it was safer to do the same.
The import is running again, though I've been having some failures in a few comments and general hangs (these might be network related). I'm keeping track of which issues might have had difficulties.
@endolith noticed that I didn't correctly relink #XXX trac id numbers to github id numbers (both trac and github create links automatically), so that will have to be handled by a postprocessing script (which it probably would have, anyway, since the github # isn't known before import).
Import has finished. The following trac #s had issues in creating the comments (I think due to network problems): 182, 297, 619, 621, 902, 904, 909 913, 914, 915, 1044, 1526. I'll review them and see if I can pull in anything missing I'll also work on a script for updating the trac crossrefs to github crossrefs. In the "no good deed goes unpunished" category, I accidentally logged in as myself (rather than numpy-gitbot) and pushed about 500 issues, so now I receive updates whenever one of them gets changed. At least most of them were closed, already... Ray