Nov. 13, 2007
4:39 a.m.
On Nov 13, 2007 6:30 AM, Travis E. Oliphant <oliphant@enthought.com> wrote:
David Cournapeau wrote: <snip> I'm also interested in moving scipy.weave into numpy (without the blitz converters which will stay in scipy).
Hi, I'm excited to hear that weave would get "elevated" to a more exposed place ! However, I was wondering, if this fits with the idea to keep numpy minimalistic !? Does this mean that weave is "simpler" that I always thought ? [I always thought it was short of magic ;-) ] Regards, Sebastian Haase