data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dcdbd/dcdbd8ddec664b034475bdd79a7426bde32cc735" alt=""
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 2:44 PM bas van beek <bas.vanbeek@hotmail.com> wrote:
Hey all,
With the recent merging of numpy/numpy#16759 <https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/16759> we’re at the point where ` ndarray` can be made generic w.r.t. its dtype and shape.
An open question which yet remains is to order in which these two parameters should appear (numpy/numpy#16547 <https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/16547>):
· `ndarray[Dtype, Shape]`
· `ndarray[Shape, Dtype]`
Hi Bas, Thanks for driving this forward! Just to speak for myself, I don't think the precise choice matters very much. There are arguments for consistency both ways. In the end Dtype and Shape are different enough that I doubt it will be a point of confusion. Also, I would guess many users will define their own type aliases, so can write something more succinct like Float64[shape] rather than ndarray[float64, shape]. We might even consider including some of these in numpy.typing. Cheers, Stephan
There has been a some discussion about this question in issue 16547, but a consensus has not yet to be reached.
Most people seem to slightly preferring one option over the other.
Are there any further thoughts on this subject?
Regards,
Bas van Beek
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion