
April 5, 2010
9:10 a.m.
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 12:56 AM, Charles R Harris <charlesr.harris@gmail.com> wrote:
Yeah, but there isn't much low level stuff there and I don't want to toss a lot of real numerical code into it.
I don't understand: there is already math code there, and you cannot be much more low level than what's there (there is already quite a bit of bit twiddling for long double). I split the code into complex and real, IEEE 754 macros/funcs in another file. I don' think we need to split into one file / function, at least not with the current size of the library. I think it is much more worthwhile to think about reorganizing the rest of numpy.core C code, the npymath library is very low hanging fruit in comparison, if only by size. David