The overhead of the np.matrix class is quite high for small matrices. See for example the following code:
import time
import math
import numpy as np
def rot2D(phi):
c=math.cos(phi);
return np.matrix(c)
_b=np.matrix(np.zeros( (1,)))
def rot2Dx(phi):
global _b
r=_b.copy()
c=math.cos(phi);
r.itemset(0, c)
return r
phi=.023
%timeit rot2D(phi)
%timeit rot2Dx(phi)
The second implementation performs much better by using a copy instead of a constructor. Is there a way to efficiency create a new np.matrix object? For other functions in my code I do not have the option to copy an existing matrix, but I need to construct a new object or perform a cast from np.array to np.matrix.
I am already aware of two alternatives:
- Using the .dot functions from np.array. This works, but personally I like the notation using np.matrix much better.
With kind regards,
Pieter Eendebak