Chris, I can try, but in that case, please write me a unittest, so that I have a clear and unambiguous idea of what you expect. ANFSCD, have you tried the missing_values option ? On Dec 2, 2008, at 5:36 PM, Christopher Barker wrote:
Pierre GM wrote:
I think that treating an explicitly-passed-in ' ' delimiter as identical to 'no delimiter' is a bad idea. If I say that ' ' is the delimiter, or '\t' is the delimiter, this should be treated *just* like ',' being the delimiter, where the expected output is: ['1', '2', '3', '4', '', '5']
Valid point. Well, all, stay tuned for yet another "yet another implementation..."
While we're at it, it might be nice to be able to pass in more than one delimiter: ('\t',' '). though maybe that only combination that I'd really want would be something and '\n', which I think is being treated specially already.
-Chris
-- Christopher Barker, Ph.D. Oceanographer
Emergency Response Division NOAA/NOS/OR&R (206) 526-6959 voice 7600 Sand Point Way NE (206) 526-6329 fax Seattle, WA 98115 (206) 526-6317 main reception
Chris.Barker@noaa.gov _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion