3 Aug
2018
3 Aug
'18
8:02 p.m.
On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 1:45 PM, Peter Creasey
wrote:
+1 for keeping the same CoC as Scipy, making a new thing just seems a bigger surface area to maintain. Personally I already assumed Scipy's "honour[ing] diversity in..." did not imply any protection of behaviours that violate the CoC *itself*, but if you wanted to be really explicit you could add "to the extent that these do not conflict with this code of conduct." to that line.
I prefer that to the proposed modification, short and sweet. Chuck