On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 1:45 PM, Peter Creasey <p.e.creasey.00@googlemail.com> wrote:
+1 for keeping the same CoC as Scipy, making a new thing just seems a
bigger surface area to maintain. Personally I already assumed Scipy's
"honour[ing] diversity in..." did not imply any protection of
behaviours that violate the CoC *itself*, but if you wanted to be
really explicit you could add "to the extent that these do not
conflict with this code of conduct." to that line.

I prefer that to the proposed modification, short and sweet.

ChuckÂ