![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/0ae63172e0c36fce455c589d0b4483bb.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
How can we use numpy's random `integers` function to get uniformly selected integers from an arbitrarily large `high` limit? This is important when dealing with exact probabilities in combinatorially large solution spaces. I propose that we add the capability for `integers` to construct arrays of type object_ by having it construct python int's as the objects in the returned array. This would allow arbitrarily large integers. The Python random library's `randrange` constructs values for arbitrary upper limits -- and they are exact when using subclasses of `random.Random` with a `getrandbits` methods (which includes the default rng for most operating systems). Numpy's random `integers` function rightfully raises on `integers(20**20, dtype=int64)` because the upper limit is above what can be held in an `int64`. But Python `int` objects store arbitrarily large integers. So I would expect `integers(20**20, dtype=object)` to create random integers on the desired range. Instead a TypeError is raised `Unsupported dtype dtype('O') for integers`. It seems we could provide support for dtype('O') by constructing Python `int` values and this would allow arbitrarily large ranges of integers. The core of this functionality would be close to the seven lines used in [the code of random.Random._randbelow](https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/eb953d6e4484339067837020f77eecac61f8d...) which 1) finds the number of bits needed to describe the `high` argument. 2) generates that number of random bits. 3) converts them to a python int and checks if it is larger than the input `high`. If so, repeat from step 2. I realize that people can just use `random.randrange` to obtain this functionality, but that doesn't return an array, and uses a different RNG possibly requiring tracking two RNG states. This text was also used to create [Issue #24458](https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/24458)