Sept. 12, 2000
1:03 p.m.
Konrad Hinsen (hinsen@cnrs-orleans.fr) wrote:
I haven't done any comparisons, but I suspect that Numeric.take() is faster for large arrays. Try this:
Yes, indeed. Actually, it is so fast that the first time I rewrote the script last week I was quite convinced it had to be buggy. Thanks again everyone, Oliver -- Oliver Hofmann - University of Cologne - Department of Biochemistry o.hofmann@smail.uni-koeln.de - setar@gmx.de - connla@thewell.com "It's too bad she won't live. But then, who does?" <Gaff, Blade Runner>