On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 11:11, Charles R Harris
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Robert Kern
wrote: On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 10:56, Charles R Harris
wrote: On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 9:43 AM, Robert Kern
wrote: On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 10:40, Charles R Harris
wrote: Hi All,
David Cournapeau has mentioned that he would like to have a numpy math library that would supply missing functions and I'm wondering how we should organise the source code. Should we put a mathlib directory in numpy/core/src?
David already did this: numpy/core/src/npymath/
Yeah, but there isn't much low level stuff there and I don't want to toss a lot of real numerical code into it.
Who cares? I don't.
I care. I want the code to be organized.
Then do it when there is code and we can see what needs to be organized.
Maybe a subdirectory?
I'm guessing YAGNI. Code first. Reorganize later, if necessary.
Would that be Are or Aren't? I'm going for the first.
"Ain't", actually. Show us the code first. Until you do, I can't imagine that there will be enough to add another layer of hierarchy to the four we already have. -- Robert Kern "I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had an underlying truth." -- Umberto Eco