Great, thanks! And we can certainly try to either move into planning at the end, or plan for such afterwards.
On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 8:40 PM, Charles R Harris <firstname.lastname@example.org
On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 9:19 PM, Charles R Harris < email@example.com> wrote:
On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 8:29 PM, Fernando Perez firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
I've just created a page on the numpy wiki:
I'd appreciate it if people could put down on that page the title of topics, plus a brief summary (with links to this or other relevant threads), they'd like to see discussed.
BoFs can be very useful but they can also easily devolve into random digressions. I'll do my best to fulfill my role as discussion facilitator by pushing for an agenda for the discussion that can fit realistically in the time we have, and trying to keep us on track.
It would help a lot if people put their ideas in advance, so we can sort/refine/prioritize a little bit. Hopefully this will lead to a more productive conversation.
I've been thinking more along the lines of a planning session than a panel discussion, something like the round table discussions that preceded implementation of python3 support and the move to github. Perhaps we could arrange something like that as a follow up on the BOF meetup.
I've added a preliminary list of topics. I'm sure there is more to be added.
NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion