28 Apr
2010
28 Apr
'10
1:43 p.m.
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 1:30 PM, David Warde-Farley dwf@cs.toronto.edu wrote:
On 2010-04-28, at 12:05 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
a(b) is equivalent to dot(a,b)
a(b)(c) would be equivalent to dot(dot(a,b),c)
This seems rather reasonable.
Indeed, and it leads to a rather pleasant way of permuting syntax to change the order of operations, i.e. a(b(c)) vs. a(b)(c).
I like the explicit dot method much better, __call__ (parentheses) can mean anything, and reading the code will be more difficult. (especially when switching from matlab)
Josef
David _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion