I will try to put a note in the transpose section if there isn't one there
already. As noted, there are numerous reference-instead-of-a-copy returns in
Numeric which reflect the speed rather than safety orientation of the
original designer. Many complaints of this nature are a complaint about that
choice, which made a package that was harder to understand and more
difficult to use safely but which is about as fast as possible. I didn't
like some of these choices but then again I didn't do the work.
-----Original Message-----
From: numpy-discussion-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
[mailto:numpy-discussion-admin@lists.sourceforge.net]On Behalf Of Tim
Hochberg
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 1:35 PM
To: numpy-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Numpy-discussion] Re: Numeric.transpose (incorrect
documentation)
"Curtis Jensen"
the documenation for the "transpose" function for the "Numeric" module seems to be incoorect, or at least missleading.
The correct place for this is probably the numpy-discussion list, so I'm cc'ing it there. Perhaps the Paul Dubois will see it and have some ideas for clearing of the docs.