Re: [Numpy-discussion] fftw supported?

On 4 June 2014 23:34, Alexander Eberspächer wrote:

If you feel pyfftw bothers you with too many FFTW details, you may try something like https://github.com/aeberspaecher/transparent_pyfftw (be careful, it's a hack that has seen only little testing).

pyFFTW provides a drop-in replacement for Numpy and Scipy's fftw: https://hgomersall.github.io/pyFFTW/pyfftw/interfaces/interfaces.html You can still set the number of threads and other advanced parameters, but you can just ignore them and view it as a very simple library. Does your wrapper set these to reasonable values? If not, I am missing completely the point. I am starting to use pyFFTW, and maybe I can help you test tfftw. /David.