Thanks Rob,
I agree. Your suggestion is the better way.
Colin W.
On 19/07/2013 11:09 AM,
numpy-discussion-request@scipy.org wrote:
1. Today's Topics: 1. Re: User Guide (Rob Clewley)
[snip]
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 18:21:24 -0400
From: Rob Clewley
<rob.clewley@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Numpy-discussion] User Guide
To: Discussion of Numerical Python
<numpy-discussion@scipy.org>
Message-ID:
<CA+7tCySr-Cf7yNMpBnj+bL69Q1+NXsjqrP2W6XhyoObg57c_-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Hi,
I see the desire for stylistic improvement by removing the awkward
parens but your correction has incorrect grammar. One cannot have
"arrays of Python," nor are Numpy objects a subset of "Python"
(because Python is not a set) -- both of which are what your
sentence
technically states. I.e., the commas are in the wrong place. You
could
say
"The exception: one can have arrays of python objects (including
those
from numpy) thereby allowing for arrays of different sized
elements."
but I think it is even clear to just unpack this a bit more with
"The exception: one can have arrays of python objects, including
numpy
objects, which allows arrays to contain different sized elements."
In my experience, attempting to be extremely concise in technical
writing is a common cause of awkward grammar problems like this. I
do
it all the time :)
-Rob
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 9:18 AM, Colin J. Williams
<cjwilliams43@gmail.com> wrote: