On 2013/06/12 8:13 AM, Warren Weckesser wrote:Consensus on np.filled? absolutely not, you do not have a consensus.
> That's why I suggested 'filledwith' (add the underscore if you like).
> This also allows a corresponding masked implementation, 'ma.filledwith',
> without clobbering the existing 'ma.filled'.
np.filledwith or filled_with: fine with me, maybe even with
everyone--let's see. I would prefer the underscore version.
NumPy-Discussion mailing list