On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 8:33 PM, Friedrich Romstedt <friedrichromstedt@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Ralf,

2010/12/5 Ralf Gommers <ralf.gommers@googlemail.com>:
> It does look like a complete set. And it was named correctly and in sync
> with python.org for a single week. From pythonmac list:
>
> "With Python 2.7, there are two Mac OS X installer variants available for
> download: the "traditional" 32-bit-only (Intel and PPC) version that
> installs and runs on all versions of OS X from 10.3.9 through current
> 10.6.x; and a new 64-bit/32-bit (Intel only) variant.  As discussed in
> http://bugs.python.org/issue9227, there were problems using Tkinter and
> IDLE with the original 2.7 64/32 installer.  The problem is that the
> only supported non-X11 64-bit Tcl/Tk at the moment is the one supplied
> by Apple in 10.6 and the installer tried unsuccessfully to support both
> 10.5 and 10.6.  For 2.7.1, the 64/32 installer now only supports 10.6.x
> and will only use the Apple-supplied Tcl/Tk 8.5.  The 32-bit-only
> installer is still built to link with either an Active/State Tcl/Tk 8.4,
> if installed in /Library/Frameworks, or fallback to the Apple-supplied
> Tcl/Tk 8.4 in OS X 10.4 through 10.6."
>
> So for the next release we'll build the 10.6 binary on 10.6 again. Sigh.

But the i386/ppc version should still be built on 10.5?

Yes.
 
Shall I give you commit rights on my repo for the build logs
(concerning the i386/x86_64 10.6 build)?

Sure.

Who is going to do the 10.6 builds?

I'll do that one.

Cheers,
Ralf