On Do, 2015-08-27 at 11:15 -0400, Benjamin Root wrote:
> Ok, I just wanted to make sure I understood the issue before going bug
> hunting. Chances are, it has been a bug on our end for a while now.
> Just to make sure, is the following valid?
>
>
> arr = np.zeros((5, 3))
>
> ind = np.array([True, True, True, False, True])
>
> arr[ind] # gives a 4x3 result
>
>
> Running that at the REPL doesn't produce a warning, so i am guessing
> that it is valid.
>
Sure, that is perfect (you can add the slice and write `arr[ind, :]` to
make it a bit more clear if you like I guess).
- Sebastian
>
> Ben Root
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Sebastian Berg
> <sebastian@sipsolutions.net> wrote:
> On Do, 2015-08-27 at 08:04 -0600, Charles R Harris wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 7:52 AM, Benjamin Root
> <ben.v.root@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> > Ok, I tested matplotlib master against numpy master,
> and there
> > were no errors. I did get a bunch of new deprecation
> warnings
> > though such as:
> >
> >
> "/nas/home/broot/centos6/lib/python2.7/site-packages/matplotlib-1.5.dev1-py2.7-linux-x86_64.egg/matplotlib/colorbar.py:539: VisibleDeprecationWarning: boolean index did not match indexed array along dimension 0; dimension is 5 but corresponding boolean dimension is 3
> > colors = np.asarray(colors)[igood]"
> >
> >
> > The message isn't exactly clear. I suspect the
> problem is a
> > shape mismatch, like colors is 5x3, and igood is
> just 3 for
> > some reason. Could somebody shine some light on
> this, please?
> >
> >
> >
> > IIRC, Boolean indexing would fill out the dimension, i.e.,
> len 3 would
> > be expanded to len 5 in this case. That behavior is
> deprecated.
> >
>
> Yes, this is exactly the case, you have something like:
>
> arr = np.zeros((5, 3))
> ind = np.array([True, False, False])
> arr[ind, :]
>
> and numpy nowadays thinks that such code is likely a bug (when
> the ind
> is shorter than arr it is somewhat OK, the other way around
> gets more
> creepy). If you have an idea of how to make the error message
> clearer,
> or objections to the change, I am happy to hear it!
>
> - Sebastian
>
>
> >
> > Chuck
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> > NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
> > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
_______________________________________________
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion