Hello Sebastian, I rarely use NumPy scalars directly, but the repr change could have impact in assorted downstream projects' documentation. For clarity, this idea would not alter how NumPy arrays print, would it - since they already include the type information?

np.array([34.3, 10.1, -0.5], np.float32) array([34.3, 10.1, -0.5], dtype=float32) np.array([5, 10, 0], np.uint8) array([ 5, 10, 0], dtype=uint8)

Thanks,
Peter
On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 10:42 AM Sebastian Berg

TL;DR: NumPy scalars representation is e.g. `34.3` instead of `float32(34.3)`. So the representation is missing the type information. What are your thoughts on changing that?

Hi all,

I am thinking about the next steps for NEP 50 (The NEP wants to fix the NumPy promotion rules, especially with respect to scalars):

https://numpy.org/neps/nep-0050-scalar-promotion.html

In relation to that, there was one point that Stéfan brought up previously.

The NumPy scalars (representation) currently print as numbers:

>>> np.float32(34.3) 34.3 >>> np.uint8(5) 5

That can already be confusing now. However, it gets more problematic if NEP 50 is introduced since the behavior between a Python `34.3` and `np.float32(34.3)` would differ more than it does now (please refer to the NEP).

The change would be that we should print as:

float64(34.3) (or similar?)

This Email is mainly to ask for any feedback or concern on such a change. I suspect we may have to write a very brief NEP about it.

If there is little concern, maybe we could move forward such a change promptly. Otherwise it could be moved forward together with NEP 50 and take effect in a "major" release [1].

Cheers,

Sebastian

[1] Note that for me, even a major release would hopefully not affect the majority of users or be very disruptive.

_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list -- numpy-discussion@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to numpy-discussion-leave@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/numpy-discussion.python.org/ Member address: p.j.a.cock@googlemail.com