-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Whenever I see somebody implementing code based on "Numerical Recipies", I feel obligated to send them the following link:

http://math.jpl.nasa.gov/nr/nr.html

Funny - that's the first thing I thought of too (just looking at it yesterday). Don't neglect to look at "the NR response" link buried at the very bottom of the page.

YMMV, as always . . .

More precisely, I think the point is that yourself or some other person so qualified should review any algorithm provided by a third party to ensure applicability to your problem domain.

Kevin Rodgers

"Zow" Terry Brugger zow@acm.org zow@llnl.gov -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGPfreeware 5.0i for non-commercial use Charset: noconv iQA/AwUBOL1YI6fuGVwXgOQkEQIg7QCgtysc351lOuA3zP41XXaRZdhVoQ4An0S9 UWudL1u0qIvPZumAOVkAtEnA =UXpc -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Whenever I see somebody implementing code based on "Numerical Recipies", I feel obligated to send them the following link:

http://math.jpl.nasa.gov/nr/nr.html

Funny - that's the first thing I thought of too (just looking at it yesterday). Don't neglect to look at "the NR response" link buried at the very bottom of the page.

YMMV, as always . . .

More precisely, I think the point is that yourself or some other person so qualified should review any algorithm provided by a third party to ensure applicability to your problem domain.

Kevin Rodgers

"Zow" Terry Brugger zow@acm.org zow@llnl.gov -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGPfreeware 5.0i for non-commercial use Charset: noconv iQA/AwUBOL1YI6fuGVwXgOQkEQIg7QCgtysc351lOuA3zP41XXaRZdhVoQ4An0S9 UWudL1u0qIvPZumAOVkAtEnA =UXpc -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----