Hi,
Finally, the former Scientific.IO NetCDF interface is now part of scipy.io, but I assume it only supports netCDF 3 (the documentation is not specific about that). This might be the easiest option for a portable data format (if Matlab supports it).
Yes, it is NetCDF 3.
In recent versions of Scientific, NetCDF 4 can be written and read, see http://dirac.cnrs-orleans.fr/ScientificPython/ScientificPythonManual/Scienti... N.
On 27.06.2011, at 7:11PM, Nils Becker wrote:
Finally, the former Scientific.IO NetCDF interface is now part of scipy.io, but I assume it only supports netCDF 3 (the documentation is not specific about that). This might be the easiest option for a portable data format (if Matlab supports it).
Yes, it is NetCDF 3.
In recent versions of Scientific, NetCDF 4 can be written and read, see
http://dirac.cnrs-orleans.fr/ScientificPython/ScientificPythonManual/Scienti...
Quite remarkable, since from the Scientific home page it was not obvious the package had been developed at all in the last 4 years or even made the transition from Numeric! But apparently 2.9.x is doing so; however it also requires the Unidata netCDF library and everything that comes with that. Cheers, Derek
participants (2)
-
Derek Homeier
-
Nils Becker