On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 9:53 AM, Matthew Harrigan <harrigan.matthew@gmail.com> wrote:

Here is a link to a wish list of possible ufunc enhancements. I would like to know what the community thinks.

It looks like a pretty good list of ideas worth thinking about as and when someone has time :-). I'm not sure what feedback you're looking for beyond that? Do you have a purpose in mind for this list? The main thing I'd add is: making it possible for ufunc core loops to access the dtype object. This is the main blocker on a *lot* of things, probably more so than anything else on that list, because it would allow ufunc operations to be defined for parametrized dtypes like the S and U dtypes, categorical data, etc. -n -- Nathaniel J. Smith -- https://vorpus.org