On Sat, Jun 2, 2018, at 6:22 AM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:

For Scipy, we converted the examples in the documentation to Python 3, and have essentially ignored Python 2 compatibility. So far, I remember no complaints about it.

I vote for what Pauli said.

+1 On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 1:43 PM, Juan Nunez-Iglesias <jni.soma@gmail.com> wrote:

On Sat, Jun 2, 2018, at 6:22 AM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:

...

For Scipy, we converted the examples in the documentation to Python 3, and have essentially ignored Python 2 compatibility. So far, I remember no complaints about it.

I vote for what Pauli said. _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion

On Sat, Jun 2, 2018, at 6:22 AM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:

For Scipy, we converted the examples in the documentation to Python 3, and have essentially ignored Python 2 compatibility. So far, I remember no complaints about it.

I vote for what Pauli said.

+1 On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 1:43 PM, Juan Nunez-Iglesias <jni.soma@gmail.com> wrote:

On Sat, Jun 2, 2018, at 6:22 AM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:

...

For Scipy, we converted the examples in the documentation to Python 3, and have essentially ignored Python 2 compatibility. So far, I remember no complaints about it.

I vote for what Pauli said. _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion