On 25-Mar-2014 1:00 PM, numpy-discussion-request@scipy.org wrote:

...

...

On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Nathaniel Smith<njs@pobox.com> wrote:

...

...

After 88 emails we don't have a conclusion in the other thread (see [1] for background). But we have to come to some conclusion or another if we want @ to exist:-). So I'll summarize where the discussion stands and let's see if we can find some way to resolve this.

Response in this thread so far seems (AFAICT) to have pretty much converged on same-left.

If you think that this would be terrible and there is some compelling argument against it, then please speak up! Otherwise, if no-one objects, then I'll go ahead in the next few days and put same-left into the PEP.

I think we should take a close look at broadcasting before deciding on the

Message: 3 Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 17:58:57 -0600 From: Charles R Harris <charlesr.harris@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [Numpy-discussion] Resolving the associativity/precedence debate for @ To: Discussion of Numerical Python <numpy-discussion@scipy.org> Message-ID: <CAB6mnxLyjNA5BHgOHO+U8+p3UmvXdjGg+ZUqfwi+vjFHfosxxQ@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 5:56 PM, Nathaniel Smith <njs@pobox.com> wrote: precedence.

Chuck