On 30 May 2013 13:44, Neal Becker <ndbecker2@gmail.com> wrote:

I thought the topic of this article might be of interest here:

https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!topic/julia-dev/GAdcYzmibyo

"I think Julia has great potential, and can, unlike Matlab, rid itself of its tunnel vision on matrices and embrace tensors from the ground >up"

Trying to discredit Matlab for tensors? I appreciate the enthusiasm but consider that there are high quality extensions before trying to discredit other people's work: http://www.sandia.gov/~tgkolda/TensorToolbox/index-2.5.html