2008/7/8 Stéfan van der Walt :

2008/7/8 Charles R Harris :

...

I think we should try to get a quick bug fix version out by the end of the month. What do others think?

That was the plan. We wanted a release before the conference -- early enough so that Enthought could push out an EPD release. We'd also like to include the latest docstrings to benefit the tutorials.

Just to be clear, I don't think Enthought made any commitment to make an EPD release. It is more of a wish-list item, since so many people depend on the EPD for a fully-working tool-suite. We certainly need to get a release out with the latest docstrings, though. Regards Stéfan

On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 9:23 AM, Charles R Harris wrote:

So what is the schedule? I have 4 bugs to fix and will get to them this weekend. Should we put together a bug action list?

Thanks for getting this conversation going. I have been meaning to send an email for some time now. I would like to get the 1.1.1 release out on 7/31/08, which gives us three weeks. I want to get this out soon because I would like to stick to the original plan to get the 1.2.0 release out on 8/31/2008. I will send an email about 1.2 out next, so if you want to comment on 1.2 please respond to that email. Here is a schedule for 1.1.1: - 7/20/08 tag the 1.1.1rc1 release and prepare packages - 7/27/08 tag the 1.1.1 release and prepare packages - 7/31/08 announce release Of course, this is assuming that there are no issues with the rc. This release should include only bug-fixes and possible improved documentation. Also, as a reminder, the trunk is for 1.2 development; so please remember that 1.1.1 will be tagged off the 1.1.x branch: svn co http://svn.scipy.org/svn/numpy/branches/1.1.x numpy-1.1.x Please use the NumPy 1.1.1 milestone if you want to create a bug action list: http://scipy.org/scipy/numpy/milestone/1.1.1 Thanks, -- Jarrod Millman Computational Infrastructure for Research Labs 10 Giannini Hall, UC Berkeley phone: 510.643.4014 http://cirl.berkeley.edu/

On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 7:50 AM, Charles R Harris wrote: `>

On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 6:21 PM, Sebastian Haase wrote:

...

Hi, I haven't checked out a recent numpy (( >>> N.__version__ '1.0.3.1')) But could someone please check if the division has been changed from '/' to '//' in these places:

C:\Priithon_25_win\numpy\core\numerictypes.py:142: DeprecationWarning: classic int division bytes = bits / 8 C:\Priithon_25_win\numpy\core\numerictypes.py:182: DeprecationWarning: classic int division na_name = '%s%d' % (base.capitalize(), bit/2) C:\Priithon_25_win\numpy\core\numerictypes.py:212: DeprecationWarning: classic int division charname = 'i%d' % (bits/8,) C:\Priithon_25_win\numpy\core\numerictypes.py:213: DeprecationWarning: classic int division ucharname = 'u%d' % (bits/8,) C:\Priithon_25_win\numpy\core\numerictypes.py:409: DeprecationWarning: classic int division nbytes[obj] = val[2] / 8

I don't believe we have made any changes to '/'. It is going to be tricky making the transition to 3.0, a lot of code is going to break, and we haven't started down that path. Maybe next summer...

Chuck

Hi, thanks for the reply. Could you maybe please check in these changes, and replace the '/' with '//' at those places !? The '//' operator is supported by Python 2.4 (if not before). For a "matlab / IDL - like" interactive environment I'm using numpy already for some 5+ month with the -Qnew option. And everything seems to work smoothly - so those minimal changes would advance a small step further towards the already started "true division" support. Thanks, Sebastian Haase

On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 01:49:18AM -0700, Jarrod Millman wrote:

The NumPy 1.1.1 release date (7/31/08) is rapidly approaching and we need everyone's help. Chuck Harris has volunteered to take the lead on coordinating this release.

Anybody has an idea what the status is on #844? ( http://scipy.org/scipy/numpy/ticket/844 ) Cheers, Gaël

On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:

On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 10:50 PM, Gael Varoquaux wrote:

...

On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 01:49:18AM -0700, Jarrod Millman wrote:

...

The NumPy 1.1.1 release date (7/31/08) is rapidly approaching and we need everyone's help. Chuck Harris has volunteered to take the lead on coordinating this release.

Anybody has an idea what the status is on #844? ( http://scipy.org/scipy/numpy/ticket/844 )

I suspect it is a blas problem, it doesn't show up here. David?

I believe it is a bug in ATLAS: http://math-atlas.sourceforge.net/errata3.8.0.html#RMAAT Unfortunately, this means I have to rebuild atlas on windows, which will take time ... cheers, David