"Proposal to accept NEP 34: Disallow inferring dtype=object from sequence
I propose to move the NEP https://numpy.org/neps/nep-0034.html from "draft" to "accepted" status. There were no objections (actually there were no responses at all) to the mail proposing the NEP https://mail.python.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/2019-October/080200.html. PR 14794 https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/14794 is an implementation of the first step, deprecating current automatic detection, f there are no substantive objections within 7 days from this email, then the NEP will be accepted; see NEP 0 for more details. Matti
For what it’s worth, I support this NEP. I have indeed seen this mistake often when teaching NumPy.
On 17 Nov 2019, at 8:43 am, Matti Picus <matti.picus@gmail.com> wrote:
I propose to move the NEP https://numpy.org/neps/nep-0034.html from "draft" to "accepted" status. There were no objections (actually there were no responses at all) to the mail proposing the NEP https://mail.python.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/2019-October/080200.html.
PR 14794 https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/14794 is an implementation of the first step, deprecating current automatic detection,
f there are no substantive objections within 7 days from this email, then the NEP will be accepted; see NEP 0 for more details.
Matti
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
I also support this. Small price in edge case usability for a lot less shooting yourself in the foot On Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 11:29 PM Juan Nunez-Iglesias <jni@fastmail.com> wrote:
For what it’s worth, I support this NEP. I have indeed seen this mistake often when teaching NumPy.
On 17 Nov 2019, at 8:43 am, Matti Picus <matti.picus@gmail.com> wrote:
I propose to move the NEP https://numpy.org/neps/nep-0034.html from "draft" to "accepted" status. There were no objections (actually there were no responses at all) to the mail proposing the NEP https://mail.python.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/2019-October/080200.html .
PR 14794 https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/14794 is an implementation of the first step, deprecating current automatic detection,
f there are no substantive objections within 7 days from this email, then the NEP will be accepted; see NEP 0 for more details.
Matti
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
On 16/11/19 1:42 pm, Matti Picus wrote:
I propose to move the NEP https://numpy.org/neps/nep-0034.html from "draft" to "accepted" status. There were no objections (actually there were no responses at all) to the mail proposing the NEP https://mail.python.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/2019-October/080200.html.
PR 14794 https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/14794 is an implementation of the first step, deprecating current automatic detection,
f there are no substantive objections within 7 days from this email, then the NEP will be accepted; see NEP 0 for more details.
Matti
There were no objections, we can move forward. Thanks, Matti
participants (3)
-
Juan Nunez-Iglesias -
Marcelo Gasparian Gosling -
Matti Picus