For what it’s worth, I support this NEP. I have indeed seen this mistake often when teaching NumPy.

On 17 Nov 2019, at 8:43 am, Matti Picus wrote:

I propose to move the NEP https://numpy.org/neps/nep-0034.html from "draft" to "accepted" status. There were no objections (actually there were no responses at all) to the mail proposing the NEP https://mail.python.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/2019-October/080200.html.

PR 14794 https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/14794 is an implementation of the first step, deprecating current automatic detection,

f there are no substantive objections within 7 days from this email, then the NEP will be accepted; see NEP 0 for more details.

Matti

_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion

On 16/11/19 1:42 pm, Matti Picus wrote:

I propose to move the NEP https://numpy.org/neps/nep-0034.html from "draft" to "accepted" status. There were no objections (actually there were no responses at all) to the mail proposing the NEP https://mail.python.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/2019-October/080200.html.

PR 14794 https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/14794 is an implementation of the first step, deprecating current automatic detection,

f there are no substantive objections within 7 days from this email, then the NEP will be accepted; see NEP 0 for more details.

Matti

There were no objections, we can move forward. Thanks, Matti